Thursday, September 17, 2015

September 14, 2015 Weekly Market Update from Maier & Associates Financial Group

The stock market rebounded nicely from the prior week's sell-off with each of the major indexes listed here posting positive gains last week. The Nasdaq was the leader, increasing 2.96% ahead of the previous week's close, followed by the S&P 500 and the Dow. Nevertheless, market uncertainty abounds, as investors anxiously await news from this week's Federal Reserve policymakers' meeting relative to a potential interest rate hike.

The price of gold (COMEX) dropped again, selling at about $1,107.90 by late Friday afternoon compared to $1,122.30 a week earlier. Crude oil (WTI) prices remained relatively the same, selling at $44.78/barrel by week's end. The national average retail regular gasoline price decreased to $2.437 per gallon on September 7, 2015, $0.073 under the previous week's price of $2.510 per gallon and $1.02 below a year ago.
September 14, 2015 Weekly Market Update from Maier & Associates Financial Group
Maier & Associates Financial Group is here to help!

At Maier & Associates, we are committed to helping you manage your finances as you strive to achieve your financial goals today, tomorrow, and many years down the road. Your financial success is important to us, which is why we create a wealth management strategy designed to meet your personal financial goals and dreams. Visit our website at http://maierandassociates.com/ or simply give us a call at (800) 282-4503.

Follow Us: FacebookTwitterGoogle +

Monday, September 14, 2015

7 Retirement Planning Challenges for Single Clients

7 Retirement Planning Challenges for Single Clients
Single clients generally face bigger financial limitations than married couples in retirement income planning, such as higher living costs, less savings, and restricted benefits. Help these clients effectively manage their retirement through education, special budgeting and savings strategies, investments, and other options that may be available to them.

In a retirement planning world oriented towards couples, the 42% of American seniors who are single are likely to face more significant retirement planning challenges than couples. As more investors enter retirement alone or find themselves widowed or divorced early in retirement, advisors are increasingly likely to see more single people near and in retirement in need of financial advice.

“Singles not only have many of the expenses of couples, but they also lack the ability and capacity to save as much,” says Jeff Nauta, CFA, CFP, CAIA of Henrickson Nauta Wealth Advisors in Belmont, Mich. “Singles can only save half as much through tax advantaged vehicles. In addition, savings and investing can take a back seat for many singles, especially women who have been through a divorce.”

A 2014 U.S. Census Bureau study reports that 4.3% of the 65+ population has never been married, 26.3% are widowed, and 9.9% are divorced. Factors contributing to the increase in retired singles include rising rates of midlife divorce, longer life spans of women versus men, and increases in the rates of those who have never married.

When working with singles planning for retirement, there are a number of factors to keep in mind, including:

1. Retirement expenses likely to remain high

A 2012 National Bureau of Economic Research report found that married couples may save up to 10 times as much (or more) as single people ($111,600 versus $12,500) for retirement. Costs of living for single people are much higher than for married individuals because, on a per-person basis, a single person spends 70% to 75% of what a couple spends.

Many fixed costs in retirement are not that much lower for single people than for couples. For instance, many couples can get by on one car in retirement, saving money by getting rid of a second car. That’s not an option for most retired singles, who need a car for transportation. And while a single person may be able to live in a smaller house, apartment, or condo, that living space is not likely to be half the expense of what it would cost to house a married couple.

Singles, especially those who don’t have children, may have a habit of spending freely and will need guidance around budgeting in retirement, said Andrew Wang, portfolio manager and senior vice president at Runnymede Capital Management, Inc. “Many singles are spenders rather than savers because they do not need to worry about costs like education and wedding costs for children, so budgeting and projecting expenses after retirement is important,” he added.

2. Savings opportunities limited

While single individuals obviously have the same access to retirement planning vehicles, such as IRAs and 401(k)s, as couples do, they can’t save as much as couples but face higher expenses. That’s why it’s important for single retirees to save as much before retirement as possible.

“For single clients, it is imperative to come up with a very coordinated approach to saving for retirement,” says Elle Kaplan, CEO of Lexion Capital Management LLC in New York. “Ultimately, those savings become a paycheck that has to support that client from the day she retires until her last day on earth. The plan should include a detailed analysis that discusses how much can safely be spent each year to have a comfortable retirement, taking into account a variety of different market scenarios.”

Nauta agreed, saying, “Single clients can only save half as much in tax-deferred vehicles as married couples can and with potential expenses higher, they need to save more, which isn’t always easy.”

A report from Bank of Montreal Financial Group, “Single in Retirement,” notes that many single retirees have to devote a larger share of their income towards basic needs such as shelter and transportation, leaving less for retirement savings. Inflation and longevity can take a higher toll on singles, raising the stakes in terms of saving more as early as possible. These factors also may mean that single people may have to work longer to amass sufficient savings to retire with a lessened longevity risk.

3. Social Security options more restricted

Single individuals have fewer options when it comes to taking Social Security. For most, the decision rests solely on when to take it. That is dependent upon a number of factors, but in many cases it makes sense to wait as long as possible to receive the maximum benefit, since single retirees have no other Social Security benefit to rely on.

Divorced women who were married for 10 years or more and haven’t remarried before age 60 are entitled to claim their ex-spouse’s benefit, Nauta noted. While some divorcees mistakenly believe that doing so will impact what their ex-spouse can receive from Social Security, that isn’t the case. For many women, especially those who took time off from work to take care of their children, that benefit may be significantly more than they could claim on their own.

4. Emergency savings needs greater

Without a second income and savings in the picture or survival benefits, singles planning for retirement or in retirement need to establish and maintain larger emergency funds. This is important both before and during retirement.

Before retirement, if a single person loses their job, there is no other income to fall back on. In this economy, it can take a prolonged job search, especially for a person in their 50s or 60s, and any new job may come with a lower salary and reduced benefits.

Nauta typically recommends a three-to-six-month emergency fund for couples. For a single person, that emergency fund should be six to 12 months, depending on the specific circumstances of that person’s job and finances.

5. Asset allocation decisions turn on risk tolerance

While asset allocation decisions aren’t that different for singles over couples—in fact they may be simplified because just one client is involved in making the decisions rather than two—singles may have a lower risk tolerance, because there is no other income or stream of retirement savings or pension to depend on.

“You have the same risks as far as investment risk, longevity risk, sequence of returns risk, inflation risk, long-term care, and death risk, ” said Richard Reyes, CFP, of the Financial Quarterback in Maitland, Fla. “However, many single individuals tend to believe that the risks inherent to a couple are not associated with those of single individuals. Individuals often think that no one is dependent on them or since they have been alone for so long that they will be able to take care of themselves forever.”

6. Risk management and estate issues need careful attention

Single retirees may have a greater need for additional insurance coverage. Before retirement, disability insurance can be helpful in case of an illness or injury that necessitates time off from work. During retirement, long-term care insurance can help pay for in-home or nursing home care, Nauta said, without depleting savings that may be needed in later years.

In terms of estate planning, make sure all documentation is thorough and is updated frequently as circumstances change, says Wang. “On investment accounts, singles should designate beneficiaries on their retirement accounts and maintain an appropriate will or a revocable living trust to control the ultimate disposition of his or her property at death,” he said. “Like married couples, singles should also have durable powers of attorney for financial matters and health care decisions. This should include a health care directive—or ‘living will’—to provide for management and health care decisions at the end of life. In the absence of immediate family, many singles can benefit by working closely with an advisor.”

7. Circumstances may change

While many individuals enter retirement as singles, that situation may change with co-habitation or remarriage, notes Reyes. “It’s important for single individuals to understand they might not be single forever,” he said. “They too can get married in later years, sometimes without them even intending or planning it.”

Of course, if the situation does change, it’s a good idea to consider a prenuptial agreement in the case of a remarriage or later first marriage so that both parties can protect assets that they are bringing into the marriage. A remarriage is a good time to re-examine estate planning documents as well.

Final advice on creating a solid retirement plan with single clients

Single clients face different challenges from those of married couples, so it is important to be aware of the variables they face and take those into consideration when crafting financial and investing plans. In the final analysis, as Brad Bofford, a partner with Financial Principles in Fairfield, N.J., noted, “The single client must be typically more active in their own planning since they do not have a partner to depend on, which relates not only to the monetary standpoint, but also administratively.”

Maier & Associates Financial Group is here to help!

At Maier & Associates, we are committed to helping you manage your finances as you strive to achieve your financial goals today, tomorrow, and many years down the road. Your financial success is important to us, which is why we create a wealth management strategy designed to meet your personal financial goals and dreams. Visit our website at http://maierandassociates.com/ or simply give us a call at (800) 282-4503.

Follow Us: FacebookTwitterGoogle +

Friday, August 21, 2015

The Most Important Question in Retirement Planning

The Most Important Question in Retirement Planning

It’s a touchy subject, but walking clients through a life expectancy analysis is the best way to ensure they will have enough money to live their later years in comfort and ease.

What is your clients’ #1 fear in retirement? Outliving their income. And what variable has the largest impact on whether or not they will outlive their income? Life expectancy. Your ability to successfully plan for your clients’ retirement is largely dependent on how well you can estimate their life span.

Longevity is the new buzzword in retirement planning, and rightfully so. It wasn’t that long ago when most people retired at 65 and maybe lived another five to 10 years if they were lucky. Those days are over, which makes current retirement planning a much more challenging endeavor. People are living much longer, and their retirement nest eggs must live much longer as well. Not only are life spans increasing, but statistics tell us that the longer people live, the longer they will live.

According the Social Security Administration, a man who reaches the age of 65 today is estimated to live until he is 84.3 years old. A woman turning 65 today is expected to live, on average, until she is 86.6 years of age. In addition to that, 25% of all 65-year-olds today will live past 90 and 10% will live beyond 95. This dramatic increase in life spans is also expected to continue well into the future.

Longevity planning is becoming a larger and larger component of successful retirement planning. In order to ensure that your clients do not outlive their income, maintain a comfortable lifestyle, and have choices in retirement, you must be as accurate as possible in estimating their life expectancy.

Unfortunately, estimating longevity is not even close to an exact science. The traditional approach for most advisors is to rely on actuarial tables for a best estimate. However, with life expectancies increasing practically every year, the mortality tables may no longer be enough.

Overestimating life expectancy is almost as bad as underestimating it. You may think a safe response to the whole longevity question would be to simply assume death at the age of 105. While underestimating could result in clients outliving their income, overestimating can affect the clients’ quality of life throughout their retirement by forcing them to spend less than they could.

Individual life expectancy analysis
To increase the probability of success in estimating life span, advisors should consider developing an individualized life expectancy analysis for each client. Begin by emphasizing to clients that everything you do in planning for their retirement revolves around this number. Therefore, it is critical to the success of their retirement plan that you are able to estimate their life span as accurately as possible. Only then can you begin to develop a plan that will adequately provide for that life span.

Areas you’ll want to consider when doing individualized life expectancy analysis are: medical history, family history, and lifestyle habits. Following are some questions you might want to include:

Medical and family history
  • Have they ever had a heart attack or been diagnosed with any kind of heart disease?
  • Are they or have they ever been on cholesterol medication?
  • Have they ever been diagnosed with high blood pressure?
  • If so, are they on medication?
  • Have they or anyone in their immediate family—parents, grandparents, siblings—ever had a stroke?
  • Have they or anyone in their family ever had any type of cancer?
  • Are their parents still alive?
  • If not, what did they die of and how old were they when they passed away?
  • Are all their siblings still alive?
  • Have any of their siblings experienced any serious health problems?

Lifestyle habits
  • On a scale of 1-10, with 10 being a health nut and 1 eating at McDonald’s every day, how would they rank their diet?
  • Do they exercise regularly?
  • How many times a week?
  • What kind of exercise?
  • Have they ever smoked?
  • Did either of their parents smoke?
  • How many days a week on average do they consume alcohol?
  • Do they always, sometimes, or never wear a seat belt?
  • On a scale of 1-10, with 10 being they could go postal any second and 1 they’re in a pleasant coma, how would they rank their daily stress levels?

It’s probably best to go through these questions with your client so you can add your personal touches and even some humor where appropriate. You can then explain to them that you’ll be reviewing their answers together with the actuarial tables to determine the life expectancy you’ll be using when developing their retirement plan.

Once you’ve completed the process, review the mortality tables and decide whether years should be added or subtracted from the client’s life expectancy based on their answers to the questions. A large number of “bad” answers, especially the parents’ age at death, would justify lowering your estimate, while a preponderance of “good” answers would suggest a higher estimate is appropriate. The parents’ age at death is generally considered an anchoring data point for most longevity estimates, unless death occurred by other than natural causes.

Obviously no one can know for sure how long a particular client will live. As mentioned earlier, this is definitely not an exact science, but it will likely give you a better estimate than relying on the actuarial tables alone.

The more accurate your estimate, the better your retirement planning will be. Taking clients through this process will give you additional insight into appropriate strategies to use in their retirement planning as well as proper asset allocations at different stages of their retirement.

Your clients will appreciate the extra time and thought you’ve put into getting their retirement plan right. Doing an individualized life expectancy analysis will also truly set you apart from your competition.

Maier & Associates Financial Group is here to help!

At Maier & Associates, we are committed to helping you manage your finances as you strive to achieve your financial goals today, tomorrow, and many years down the road. Your financial success is important to us, which is why we create a wealth management strategy designed to meet your personal financial goals and dreams. Visit our website at http://maierandassociates.com/ or simply give us a call at (800) 282-4503.

Follow Us: FacebookTwitterGoogle +

Wednesday, August 19, 2015

August 17, 2015 Weekly Market Update from Maier & Associates Financial Group

Stocks moved slightly ahead of last week. Both the large-cap S&P 500 and Dow posted modest gains by week's end as did the small-cap Russell 2000. The Nasdaq was relatively flat posting only a 0.09% gain week-on-week. The Global Dow, possibly influenced by the generally slumping Chinese economy coupled with that government's devaluation of the yuan, finished the week in negative territory.

The price of gold (COMEX) rebounded from last week, selling at about $1,113.20 by late Friday afternoon. Prices for crude oil (WTI) fell to a level not seen since early 2009, selling at $42.18/barrel by week's end. The national average retail regular gasoline price decreased to $2.629 per gallon on August 10, 2015, $0.060 less than last week's price and $0.876 below a year ago.

August 17, 2015 Weekly Market Update from Maier & Associates Financial Group

Maier & Associates Financial Group is here to help!

At Maier & Associates, we are committed to helping you manage your finances as you strive to achieve your financial goals today, tomorrow, and many years down the road. Your financial success is important to us, which is why we create a wealth management strategy designed to meet your personal financial goals and dreams. Visit our website at http://maierandassociates.com/ or simply give us a call at (800) 282-4503.

Follow Us: FacebookTwitterGoogle +

Wednesday, August 12, 2015

August 11, 2015 Weekly Market Update from Maier & Associates Financial Group

It could be the result of an impending interest rate hike in September, or slumping oil prices, or lackluster earnings reports from some major companies, or it could be just summer doldrums, but the stock market definitely languished this past week as it has for most of the summer. The Dow continued its losing streak, falling over 300 points by week's end. The S&P 500 and Nasdaq followed the trend as well. but the week's biggest loser was the small-cap Russell 2000, which dropped 31 points, or over 2.5%.

Possibly in response to the increasing likelihood that interest rates are going up in the near term, the price of gold (COMEX) fell a bit compared to last week, selling at about $1,093.00 by late Friday afternoon. Prices for crude oil (WTI) continued spiraling downward, selling at $43.75/barrel by week's end. The national average retail regular gasoline price decreased to $2.689 per gallon on August 3, 2015, $0.056 less than last week's price and $0.826 below a year ago.


August 11, 2015 Weekly Market Update from Maier & Associates Financial Group

Maier & Associates Financial Group is here to help!

At Maier & Associates, we are committed to helping you manage your finances as you strive to achieve your financial goals today, tomorrow, and many years down the road. Your financial success is important to us, which is why we create a wealth management strategy designed to meet your personal financial goals and dreams. Visit our website at http://maierandassociates.com/ or simply give us a call at (800) 282-4503.

Follow Us: FacebookTwitterGoogle +

Friday, August 7, 2015

August 3, 2015 Weekly Market Update from Maier & Associates Financial Group

The stock markets rebounded last week amid a tepid report from the Federal Open Market Committee seemingly halting talk of an imminent interest rate hike – although every indication points to some rate movement before the end of the year. Nevertheless, each of the major U.S. indexes showed improvement over last week. Both the large-cap Dow (121 points) and S&P 500 (24 points) posted gains, as did Nasdaq, which jumped almost 40 points. Even the Global Dow showed improvement.

On the other hand, the price of gold (COMEX) continued to hover around $1,095.00 as the demand remained weak. Crude oil (WTI) saw some upward movement early in the week, but ended up losing value – selling at $46.77/barrel as of late afternoon Friday. The national average retail regular gasoline price was $2.745 per gallon on July 27, 2015, $0.057 less than last week's price and $0.794 below a year ago.


August 3, 2015 Weekly Market Update from Maier & Associates Financial Group


August 3, 2015 Weekly Market Update from Maier & Associates Financial Group

Maier & Associates Financial Group is here to help!

At Maier & Associates, we are committed to helping you manage your finances as you strive to achieve your financial goals today, tomorrow, and many years down the road. Your financial success is important to us, which is why we create a wealth management strategy designed to meet your personal financial goals and dreams. Visit our website at http://maierandassociates.com/ or simply give us a call at (800) 282-4503.

Follow Us: FacebookTwitterGoogle +

Wednesday, July 29, 2015

Key Retirement Plan Limits and Reminders for Business Owners

Key Retirement Plan Limits and Reminders for Business Owners
Small business owners have a number of opportunities to save more money in their retirement plan accounts. The key is to know which benefits apply and the governing rules. These general guidelines can help your clients maximize their retirement contributions for 2015 and beyond.

The IRS recently announced the retirement plan limits for 2015, which includes the maximum contribution amounts and other limitations that apply to employer-sponsored retirement plans (employer plans).

In many cases, these create opportunities for your small business clients to contribute more to their retirement savings accounts. However, these benefits can be negated if the applicable rules are not followed. The following are some general guidelines that can be used to help your clients stay within the applicable limits.

$53,000 annual addition: Double-up opportunities for clients who work two jobs (with caution)

The annual addition limit for 2015 has been increased to $53,000. This limit applies to defined contribution plans, including 401(k) plans, SEP IRAs, profit-sharing plans, and 403(b) plans. Both employer contributions and salary deferral contributions are counted when determining whether contributions have reached this limit for an individual.

While many small business owners understand that this limit applies to one employer plan, some are unsure of how it applies to individuals who participate in multiple employer plans. Some either contribute too much or miss out on opportunities to make additional contributions.

If you have clients who participate in multiple retirement plans, the controlled group and affiliated service group (ASG) should be used to determine whether any such client can contribute the maximum amount to each retirement plan.

Example
  • John works for ABC Corporation and receives $53,000 in contributions to the ABC Corporation’s 401(k) plan.
  • John also runs a successful consulting business and pays himself an annual salary of $250,000 from the business.
  • There is no common ownership between the two businesses and no affiliated relationship.
  • If John establishes a 401(k), SEP IRA, or profit-sharing plan for his consulting business, he can contribute up to $53,000 to his account under that plan.
  • John’s contribution for the year could be up to $106,000, compensation allowing.
  • If John will be at least age 50 by the end of the year, he can contribute an additional $6,000 in catch-up contributions if the plan is a 401(k) plan (but see salary deferral limits below).

On the other hand, if John has ownership in two businesses and wants to contribute $53,000 to a retirement plan established for each business, it must first be determined if both businesses are part of a controlled group of companies or an ASG. In that case, both businesses are then likely treated as one for retirement plan purposes. If the businesses are not part of a controlled group or ASG, then John can contribute the maximum amount under each plan.

Note: The controlled group and ASG rules are highly complex and beyond the scope of this article. Clients should consult with an ERISA attorney for assistance with determining controlled group and ASG status.

Don’t forget the 25% cap

The maximum deductible contribution amount for the year is 25% of compensation. As a result, employer contributions to retirement plans such as small business owner 401(k) (SBO-K) plans, profit-sharing plans, and SEP IRAs are limited to the lesser of 25% of compensation or $53,000.

This means that if a participant’s compensation for the year is $50,000, the maximum employer contribution amount that can be contributed to that individual’s account under an SBO-K, SEP IRA, or profit-sharing plan is $12,500. Under an SBO-K plan, additional salary deferral contributions can be made up to $18,000, plus catch-up contributions of $6,000 if eligible.

$18,000 salary deferral limit plus $6,000 catch-up is aggregated

The salary deferral contribution limit for 2015 has increased to $18,000, plus an additional catch-up contribution of $6,000 for participants who are at least age 50 by the end of the year.

This limit applies on a “per-individual” basis. As a result, this is the maximum amount that can be contributed for the year by an individual, regardless of the number of plans in which he participates.

Exceptions to 457 plans

For this purpose, 457 plans are not included. As such, if an individual participates in a 401(k) and/or 403(b) and a 457(b) plan, she can make salary deferral contributions of up to $18,000 to the 401(k)/403(b) plan, and still make salary deferral contributions of up to $18,000 to the 457(b) plan.

If eligible, catch-up contributions of up to $6,000 can be made to each. This means that for someone who participates in a 457(b) plan and a 401(k)/403(b) plan, the total salary deferral contributions for the year can be up to $36,000, plus up to $12,000 in catch up contributions for those who are at last age 50 by the end of the year.

$12,500 plus $3,000 catch-up for SIMPLE IRAs

The salary deferral limit for SIMPLE IRAs has been increased to $12,500, plus an additional $3,000 catch-up contribution for participants who are at least age 50 by the end of the year.

When determining whether an individual has reached his/her salary deferral limit of $18,000, salary deferral contributions made to SIMPLE IRAs are taken into consideration.

$265,000 compensation cap must be used for calculating contributions

The compensation cap has been increased to $265,000. This is the maximum amount that can be taken into consideration when calculating plan contributions.

For example, assume Sue establishes a profit-sharing plan for her business. Assume too that the contribution to the plan for the year will be 10% of compensation.

If Sue pays herself W-2 wages of $300,000 for the year, the maximum amount of contribution she can receive under the plan is $26,500. While 10% of $300,000 is $30,000, the maximum amount of Sue’s compensation that can be considered when calculating her contribution is $265,000.

$600 minimum SEP IRA eligibility

The minimum eligibility compensation for SEP IRAs has been increased to $600.

An employee who meets the other eligibility requirements must be covered under a business’s SEP IRA if he receives $600 or more in compensation from the business for the year.

Keeping within limits is only part of the equation

Ensuring that contributions do not exceed statutory limits is only one of the compliance requirements for employer plans. If a client’s retirement plan covers common-law employees, testing may be required to ensure compliance. This includes performing tests to ensure that contributions do not discriminate in favor of highly compensated employees. In some cases, it may be necessary to engage the services of a third-party administrator, who would be responsible for ensuring that all compliance requirements are satisfied.

Maier & Associates Financial Group is here to help!

At Maier & Associates, we are committed to helping you manage your finances as you strive to achieve your financial goals today, tomorrow, and many years down the road. Your financial success is important to us, which is why we create a wealth management strategy designed to meet your personal financial goals and dreams. Visit our website at http://maierandassociates.com/ or simply give us a call at (800) 282-4503.

Follow Us: FacebookTwitterGoogle +